|
1. Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran, Mayonnaise and salad soses-specifications(Amendment 1), ISIRI no 2454. Karaj. ISIRI 1992 [in Persian]. 2. Raymundoa A, Francob JM, Empisc J, Sousad I. Optimization of the composition of cow-fat oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by white lupin protein. J Am Oil Chem Soc 2002; 79(8): 283-290. [ DOI:10.1007/s11746-002-0559-6] 3. Karshenas Mahsa, Goli M, Zamindar N. The effect of replacing egg yolk with sesame-peanut defatted meal milk on the physicochemical, colorimetry, and rheological properties of low-cholesterolmayonnaise. Food Sci Nutr 2018; 1:1-10. 4. Paraskevopoulou A, kiosseoglou V, Alevisopoulos S, Kasapis S. Influence of reduced cholosterol yolk on the viscoelastic behaviour of concentrated o/w emulsion. J Food Sci 1999; 12:107-111. [ DOI:10.1016/S0927-7765(98)00067-8] 5. Goankar G, Rathna K, Chen k, Campbell B. Emulsifying functionality of enzyme-modified milk proteins in o/w and mayonnaise-like emulsions. African J Food Sci 2010; 4:16-25. 6. Nikzade V, Mazaheri-Tehrani M, Saadatmand-Tarzjan M. Optimization of low-cholesterol low-fat mayonniase formulation: Effect of using soy milk and some stabilizer by a mixture design approach. Food Hydrocolloid 2012; 28: 344-352. [ DOI:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.12.023] 7. Alemzadeh T, Mohammadifar M A, Azizi M H, Ghanati K. Effect of two different species of Iranian gum tragacanth on the rheological properties of mayonnaise sauce. Iranian J Food Sci Tech 2010; 7(3):127-141[in Persian]. 8. Hennock M, Rahalkar R, Richmonel P. Effect of xanthan gum upon the rheology and stability of o/w emulation. J Food Sci 1985; 49: 1271-1274. [ DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb14968.x] 9. Papalamprou EM, Maki EA, Kiosseoglu VD, Doxastar-is GI. Effect of medium molecular weight xanthan gum in rheology and stability of o/w emulsion stabilized with legume protein. J Sci Food Agri 2005; 85(12): 1967-1973. [ DOI:10.1002/jsfa.2159] 10. Herald TJ, Abugoush M, Aramoun F. Physical and sensory properties of egg yolk and egg yolk substitutes in a model mayonnaise system. J Texture Stud 2009; 40: 692-709. [ DOI:10.1111/j.1745-4603.2009.00206.x] 11. Abdullah A, Resurreccion AVA, Beuchat LR. Formulation and evaluation of a peanut milk based whipped topping using response surface methodology. LWT-Food Sci Technol 1993; 26:162-166. [ DOI:10.1006/fstl.1993.1033] 12. Bourne M. Texture Profile Analysis. Food Techol 1973; 32:62-66. 13. Fiszman S, Damasio M. Suitability of single-compression and TPA tests to determine adhesivness in solid and semi-solid foods. J Texture Stud 2000; 31: 55-68. [ DOI:10.1111/j.1745-4603.2000.tb00284.x] 14. Wendin K, Hall G. Thickener and emulsifier contents on salad dressing: static and dynamic sensory and rheological analyses. Academic Press 2001; 222-231. [ DOI:10.1006/fstl.2001.0757] 15. Liu H, Xu XM, Guo SHD. Rheological, texture and sensory properties of low fat mayonnaise with different fat mimetics. LWT-Food Sci Technol 2007; 40: 946-954. [ DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2006.11.007] 16. Szczesniak A, Brandt M, Freidman, H. Development of standard rating scales for mechanical parameters and correlation between the objective and sensory texture measurements. Food Technol 1963; 28:397-403. [ DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1963.tb00217.x] 17. Mun S, Kim, YL, Kang C, Shim J, Kim Y. Development of reduced-fat mayonnaise using 4[alpha] gtase-modified rice starch and xanthan gum. Int J Biol Macromol 2009; 44 (5): 400-407. [ DOI:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.02.008] 18. Mancini F, Montanari L, Peressini D, Fantozzi P. Influence of alginate concentration and molecular weight on functional properties of mayonnaise. LWT-Food Sci Technol 2002; 35:517-525. [ DOI:10.1006/fstl.2002.0899] 19. Ma L, Barbosa C, Novas GV. Rheological characterization of mayonnaise. Part II: Flow and viscoelastic properties at different oil and xanthan gum concentrations. J Food Eng 1995; 25: 409-425. [ DOI:10.1016/0260-8774(94)00010-7] 20. Ven CV, Courvoisier C. High pressure versus heat treatments for pasteurization and sterilization of model emulsions. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 2007; 8: 232-236. [ DOI:10.1016/j.ifset.2006.12.001] 21. Pressini D, Sensidoni A, Cindio B. Rheological characterization of traditional and light mayonnaises. J Food Eng 1998; 35:409-417. [ DOI:10.1016/S0260-8774(98)00032-6] 22. Barzegari M, RaftaniAmiri Z, Motamedzadehgan A, Mohamadzadeh-Milani J. Effect of persian gum and xanthan on the quality of mayonnaise. J Food Res 2015; 26(2):207-219. 23. Nor-Hayati I, Cheman YB, Tan CP, Nor-aini I. Droplet characterization and stability of soybean oil/palm kernel olein O/W emulsions with the presence of selected polysaccharides. Food Hydrocolloid 2009; 23:233-243. [ DOI:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.01.004] 24. McClements C, Demetriades K. An integrated approach to the development of reduced-fat food emulsions. Crit Rev Food Sci 1998 38;511-536. [ DOI:10.1080/10408699891274291] 25. Mirghafouri S, Rahimi S. Evaluation of physico-chemical, emulsion and rheological properties of soy sauce containing soy milk and aloe-vera gel. 2016; Inovative Food Technol 11:73-83. 26. Fauziah CI, Zaibunnisa AH, Osman H, Wan Aida WM. Physicochemical analysis of cholesterol-reduced egg yolk powder and its application in mayonnaise. Int Food Res J 2016; 23(2): 575-582 27. Worrasinchai S, Suphantharika M, Pinjai S, Jamnong P. Β-Glucan prepared from spent brewer's yeast as a fat replacer in mayonnaise. J Food Hydrocolloid 2006 20:68-78. [ DOI:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2005.03.005] |
