[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
this is a test
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Webmail::
Ethical Consideration::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 18, Issue 1 (Spring 2023) ::
Iranian J Nutr Sci Food Technol 2023, 18(1): 55-63 Back to browse issues page
Effects of Replacing Breadcrumbs and Soy Protein with Teff (Eragrostis tef) Flour on Physicochemical and Sensory Characteristics of Typical Hamburgers
Z Hasani , H Hosseini , S Shojaee Aliabadi * , M Moslehishad*
Dept. of Food Sciences & Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences , saeedeh.shojaee@gmail.com
Abstract:   (989 Views)
Background and Objectives: Nowadays, interests in ready-to-eat foods, especially ordinary burgers, have increased. To produce typical burgers, breadcrumbs and soybean meals are commonly used as fillers. Use of breadcrumbs and soybean meals in regular burgers limits choice of consumers with allergies. The aim of this study was to produce typical hamburger products by replacing breadcrumbs and soybean meals, which could be used by people with celiac disease and sensitivity to soy protein.
Materials and Methods: In this study, mixtures of breadcrumbs and soybean meals respectively decreased by 50 and 100% and similar quantities of teff flour were substituted for these mixtures in low-meat hamburgers. Then, physicochemical, sensory  and cooking characteristics of treatments containing teff flour were compared with those of control sample.
Results: The control sample included the highest cooking yield (92.45%) and the lowest moisture retention (68.87%) and TF100% treatment (31.10%) included the lowest oil absorption within all samples (p < 0.05). Samples containing teff flour received a higher score in the characteristics of smell and color. In sensory evaluation no significant differences were observed between the samples in terms of texture, taste and overall acceptance (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Results of this study showed that replacing breadcrumbs and soybean meals with teff flour in low-meat hamburgers could be appropriate in terms of decreasing fat absorption and improving moisture retention and sensory and
Keywords: Low meat hamburger, Teff flour, Gluten free, Sensory characteristics
Full-Text [PDF 771 kb]   (261 Downloads)    
Article type: Research | Subject: Food Science
Received: 2022/07/23 | Accepted: 2022/10/4 | Published: 2023/04/15
References
1. Motamedi A, Vahdani M, Baghaei H, Borghei MA. Considering the Physicochemical and Sensorial Properties of Momtaze Hamburgers Containing Lentil and Chickpea Seed Flour. Nutrition and Food Sciences Research. 2015;2(3):55-62.
2. Sabzi Belekhkanlu A, Mirmoghtadayi M, Hosseini H, Hosseini M, Ferdosi R, Shojaee Aliabadi S. Effect of Amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) Seed Flour as a Soya Protein and Bread Crumbs on Physicochemical and Sensory Properties of a Typical Meat Hamburger. Iranian Journal of Nutrition Sciences & Food Technology. 2016;11(3):115-22. [in Persian]
3. Verma AK, Rajkumar V, Kumar S. Effect of amaranth and quinoa seed flour on rheological and physicochemical properties of goat meat nuggets. Journal of food Science and Technology. 2019;56(11):5027-3. [DOI:10.1007/s13197-019-03975-4]
4. Bahmanyar F, Hosseini SM, Mirmoghtadaie L, Shojaee-Aliabadi S. Effects of replacing soy protein and bread crumb with quinoa and buckwheat flour in functional beef burger formulation. Meat science. 2021;172:108305. [DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108305]
5. do Prado MEA, Queiroz VAV, da Veiga Correia VT, Neves EO, Roncheti EFS, Gonçalves ACA, et al. Physicochemical and sensorial characteristics of beef burgers with added tannin and tannin-free whole sorghum flours as isolated soy protein replacer. Meat science. 2019;150:93-100. [DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.12.006]
6. Öztürk-Kerimoğlu B, Kavuşan HS, Tabak D, Serdaroğlu M. Formulating reduced-fat sausages with quinoa or teff flours: effects on emulsion characteristics and product quality. Food Science of Animal Resources. 2020;40(5):710. [DOI:10.5851/kosfa.2020.e46]
7. Tefera H, Belay G, Sorrells M. Narrowing the Rift. Tef research and development. 2001.
8. Baye K. Teff: nutrient composition and health benefits. Intl Food Policy Res Inst. 2014;67.
9. Zhu F. Chemical composition and food uses of teff (Eragrostis tef). Food chemistry. 2018;239:402-15. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.101]
10. Fischer MM, Egli IM, Aeberli I, Hurrell RF, Meile L. Phytic acid degrading lactic acid bacteria in tef-injera fermentation. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2014;190:54-60. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.08.018]
11. Koubová E, Mrázková M, Sumczynski D, Orsavová J. In vitro digestibility, free and bound phenolic profiles and antioxidant activity of thermally treated Eragrostis tef L. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2018;98(8):3014-21. [DOI:10.1002/jsfa.8800]
12. Forsido SF, Rupasinghe HV, Astatkie T. Antioxidant capacity, total phenolics and nutritional content in selected ethiopian staple food ingredients. International journal of food sciences and nutrition. 2013;64(8):915-20. [DOI:10.3109/09637486.2013.806448]
13. Ahmed IAM, Uslu N, Al Juhaimi F, Özcan MM, Osman MA, Alqah HA, et al. Effect of roasting treatments on total phenol, antioxidant activity, fatty acid compositions, and phenolic compounds of teff grains. Cereal Chemistry. 2021;98(5):1027-37. [DOI:10.1002/cche.10442]
14. Mohammed MI, Mustafa AI, Osman GA. Evaluation of Wheat Breads Supplemented with Teff ('Eragrostis tef (ZUCC.') Trotter) Grain Flour. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2009;3(4):207-12.
15. Hager A-S, Lauck F, Zannini E, Arendt EK. Development of gluten-free fresh egg pasta based on oat and teff flour. European Food Research and Technology. 2012;235(5):861-71. [DOI:10.1007/s00217-012-1813-9]
16. Ju A, Song KB. Development of teff starch films containing camu-camu (Myrciaria dubia Mc. Vaugh) extract as an antioxidant packaging material. Industrial Crops and Products. 2019;141:111737. [DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111737]
17. Horwitz W. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. Volume I, agricultural chemicals, contaminants, drugs/edited by William Horwitz: Gaithersburg (Maryland): AOAC International, 1997.; 2010.
18. Heck RT, Vendruscolo RG, de Araújo Etchepare M, Cichoski AJ, de Menezes CR, Barin JS, et al. Is it possible to produce a low-fat burger with a healthy n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio without affecting the technological and sensory properties. Meat Sci. 2017;130:16-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.03.010]
19. Selani MM, Shirado GA, Margiotta GB, Saldaña E, Spada FP, Piedade SM, et al. Effects of pineapple byproduct and canola oil as fat replacers on physicochemical and sensory qualities of low-fat beef burger. Meat Science. 2016;112:69-76. [DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.10.020]
20. Modi V, Mahendrakar N, Rao DN, Sachindra N. Quality of buffalo meat burger containing legume flours as binders. Meat science. 2004;66(1):143-9. [DOI:10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00078-0]
21. Zamuz S, López-Pedrouso M, Barba FJ, Lorenzo JM, Domínguez H, Franco D. Application of hull, bur and leaf chestnut extracts on the shelf-life of beef patties stored under MAP: Evaluation of their impact on physicochemical properties, lipid oxidation, antioxidant, and antimicrobial potential. Food Research International. 2018;112:263-73 [DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2018.06.053]
22. R.Vakili. Determination of digestible essential amino acids concentrations in some poultry feedstuffs. Department of animal science,Islamic Azad univercity, branch of kashmar. Journal of agricultural sciences isiamic Azad University.2019;141:111737.
23. Shumoy H, Gabaza M, Vandevelde J, Raes K. Soluble and bound phenolic contents and antioxidant capacity of tef injera as affected by traditional fermentation. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2017;58:52-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.jfca.2017.01.004]
24. Shokry AM. The usage of quinoa flour as a potential ingredient in production of meat burger with functional properties. Middle East J Appl Sci. 2016;6:1128-37.
25. Ahamed NT, Singhal RS, Kulkarni PR, Pal M. Deep fat-fried snacks from blends of soya flour and corn, amaranth and chenopodium starches. Food chemistry. 1997;58(4):313-7. [DOI:10.1016/S0308-8146(96)00160-4]
26. Sheridan P, Shilton N. Analysis of yield while cooking beefburger patties using far infrared radiation. Journal of Food Engineering. 2002;51(1):3-11. [DOI:10.1016/S0260-8774(01)00029-2]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hasani Z, Hosseini H, Shojaee Aliabadi S, Moslehishad* M. Effects of Replacing Breadcrumbs and Soy Protein with Teff (Eragrostis tef) Flour on Physicochemical and Sensory Characteristics of Typical Hamburgers. Iranian J Nutr Sci Food Technol 2023; 18 (1) :55-63
URL: http://nsft.sbmu.ac.ir/article-1-3525-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 18, Issue 1 (Spring 2023) Back to browse issues page
Iranian Journal of  Nutrition Sciences and Food  Technology
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645